4 Comments
Leave a comment
Categories
Monthly Archives
- March 2009 (8)
- February 2009 (7)
- January 2009 (14)
- December 2008 (15)
- November 2008 (12)
- October 2008 (9)
- September 2008 (10)
- August 2008 (13)
- July 2008 (28)
- June 2008 (17)
- May 2008 (13)
- April 2008 (15)
- March 2008 (7)
- February 2008 (5)
- January 2008 (2)
- November 2007 (4)
- October 2007 (8)
- September 2007 (7)
- August 2007 (3)
- July 2007 (10)
- June 2007 (4)
- May 2007 (5)
- April 2007 (9)
- March 2007 (11)
- February 2007 (7)
- January 2007 (4)
- December 2006 (9)
- November 2006 (14)
- October 2006 (10)
- September 2006 (9)
- August 2006 (6)
- July 2006 (15)
- June 2006 (22)
- May 2006 (17)
- April 2006 (13)
- March 2006 (18)
- February 2006 (10)
- January 2006 (28)
- December 2005 (17)
- November 2005 (15)
- October 2005 (18)
- September 2005 (24)
- August 2005 (39)
- July 2005 (14)
- June 2005 (22)
- May 2005 (32)
- April 2005 (27)
- March 2005 (32)
- February 2005 (20)
- January 2005 (38)
- December 2004 (49)
- November 2004 (38)
- October 2004 (24)
- September 2004 (23)
- August 2004 (38)
- July 2004 (39)
- June 2004 (38)
- May 2004 (17)
- April 2004 (32)
- March 2004 (15)
- February 2004 (6)
- January 2004 (19)
- December 2003 (19)
- November 2003 (15)
- October 2003 (15)
- September 2003 (12)
- August 2003 (20)
- July 2003 (26)
Search
March 2009
About this Entry
This page contains a single entry by Pank published on October 17, 2005 1:58 AM.
避開中山高收費站之路徑 was the previous entry in this blog.
Nopam is the next entry in this blog.
Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.
路過看到討論,覺得很有意思..
我認為走節費路線的二類電信,最後會因為一類電信的加入而沒有生存的空間. 以大家可以想想,雖然Skype創造了一個網路電話的奇蹟,但是他們強調網路的分享,與使用網路的便利性,而並非是服務. 我覺得服務可以是客製化,可以是一般化,但是服務是有價的,因此二類電信業者可以往如何創造有價值的服務來作思考.
看看D-Link也從硬體銷售的角度整合服務,提供所謂的mydlink 2.0的語音服務,不難看出當初正文+普羅+FreePP的用心了.
正在尋找 FreePP 的相關東東, 剛好經過這兒, 看到各位爺兒們談起 FreePP的一些所謂的內幕, 有幾點不懂, 請教.
1) FreePP是正文所轉投資的一家公司, 不知您是否對他很清楚, 不然為何說他是"外行領導內行", 您曾在FreePP待過嗎?
2) eBay 買SkyPe就值的我们深思, 我们以SkyPe為市場目標就是???, 蠻奇怪的邏輯.
3) FreePP對上 Skype是 "小槍對上大砲", 有什麼不對, 有什麼不好?
4) 三十年前, Microsoft 對上 IBM, 那算什麼?
5) 總歸一句, 為什麼要以貶低自己來表示 --- 我很懂???
的確外行領導內行是無法再短時間內看到好成績的.不過國內稱的上內行的人物與公司,都已經倒的倒,逃的逃...那請問如果這些稱內行的人都無法把自己的公司與專業搞好,那他們被稱為內行不就是很好笑?如果大家還是以國內固有二類電信的經營型態來看Skype的模式,而不是以網路的思維來操作,那一定完蛋的.ebay要買Skype就值得我們深思,而不是一味的要抱skype大腿說要幫它服務作產品與接入系統...
這個freepp是正文轉投資的子公司做的, 叫普羅, 是目標想要朝向skype沒錯啦, 不過, 小槍對上大砲, 說小槍算是看的起的說法了, 如果真的要我去評估底層的話, 連小槍都算不上! 唉! 太多內幕了, 外行領導內行, 很難有發展的啦!